i have found an article which provides a line of explanation to my last question.
here's a link to the article.
here's the quote:
"The government comes up with the most bizarre, dangerous nonsense, and it indicates that they are abdicating themselves of all responsibility by saying that she may have knocked her head or concussed her head against one of the levers on the sunroof," Rehman said.
(Rehman is Sherry Rehman, Peoples Party information secretary and was in the caravan that day)
Sunday, December 30, 2007
Saturday, December 29, 2007
insight?
can anyone enlighten me as to the relevance of the possibility that benazir bhutto died from hitting her head? if she did, is that supposed to exonerate someone or some entity? i can't seem to figure out the implications of this new revelation and yet, no one will elaborate to enlighten me... at least no one on the radio. i suppose i could search out more text for the answer, but maybe someone reading this will know, so i'll check here first.
i mean, they couldn't possibly be implying that the entire death was an accident... an unfortunate slip and fall.
they couldn't possibly be implying that more security would have been pointless because... well... i don't know... i'm not an expert in security, but isn't security supposed to keep guns and bombs at bay, so that the immediate results of these things (i.e. impact... be it from actual shrapnel or shrapnel-less force) don't happen? i don't see how they could be implying exoneration and yet i can't seem to think of any other reason this would be an issue.
lest i'm being just as ambiguous: the person who attempts murder, thinks they've accomplished it (when in reality they have not), takes that person out to a ditch to rid themselves of the body, in the middle of winter... and the person in fact dies of exposure to the elements... well, they've still caused that person's death, just not in the manner they supposed. still, they could be found guilty of murder, rather than simply attempted murder.
i could be way off on a tangent and not know it because there could very possibly be some other reason it is (seemingly) such a big deal that she died of a skull fracture and not a bullet or shrapnel, so if you know, please share!
i mean, they couldn't possibly be implying that the entire death was an accident... an unfortunate slip and fall.
they couldn't possibly be implying that more security would have been pointless because... well... i don't know... i'm not an expert in security, but isn't security supposed to keep guns and bombs at bay, so that the immediate results of these things (i.e. impact... be it from actual shrapnel or shrapnel-less force) don't happen? i don't see how they could be implying exoneration and yet i can't seem to think of any other reason this would be an issue.
lest i'm being just as ambiguous: the person who attempts murder, thinks they've accomplished it (when in reality they have not), takes that person out to a ditch to rid themselves of the body, in the middle of winter... and the person in fact dies of exposure to the elements... well, they've still caused that person's death, just not in the manner they supposed. still, they could be found guilty of murder, rather than simply attempted murder.
i could be way off on a tangent and not know it because there could very possibly be some other reason it is (seemingly) such a big deal that she died of a skull fracture and not a bullet or shrapnel, so if you know, please share!
Tuesday, December 25, 2007
Sunday, December 16, 2007
25 week update
Monday, December 10, 2007
run run rudolph
this past weekend we went to chicago so greg and his brother could run 3.1 miles over ice and through the cold early in the morning. you'd think they might be alone in this endeavor, but apparently 946 others thought it a compelling idea as well...
brothers, pre-race...
afterwards, free hot chocolate and coffee. later, a t-shirt mailed home, and maybe a medal! though the logic escapes me, if the person who placed first in one's age group also places first (or second, or third) overall, the person who technically placed second in that age group gets bounced up to first... the third up to second... and the fourth up to third (and so on and so forth).
so, having placed fourth in an age group containing the number 1 guy overall, greg may well just get the bronze! woot!
however, i suppose if you're going to get a pair of free foam-like antlers, it might just be worth the price of admission...
brother-in-law had to grow his antlers... painful...
brothers, pre-race...
so, having placed fourth in an age group containing the number 1 guy overall, greg may well just get the bronze! woot!
Sunday, December 09, 2007
pets
i must say, it is so nice to have pets in the house. never before have i had so many pets at once. just three. but in a small condo, you can look in any direction at any given time and find either a sleeping cat, or a busy cat or a scruffling puppy, whatever scruffling puppies do.
dracula and ollie really do seem to be friends. i think it's because both have the ability and the desire to be friends with pretty much everyone, so of course, it makes sense that they would befriend one another.
dracula and ollie really do seem to be friends. i think it's because both have the ability and the desire to be friends with pretty much everyone, so of course, it makes sense that they would befriend one another.
rabbit on the other hand, has the desire to be friends with anyone who has food for her. otherwise, she would rather oversee things as though an aloof and ambitious supervising manager. always calling us into her office to say, "look, this is about as low as i'd like this food bowl to get. and can you keep that dog away from it? thanks."
how can we not love them?
how can we not love them?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)